Cem Ilkel vs Alberto Barroso Campos Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W W L W W W L
Form
L W W W L W W L W LHead-To-Head: Ilkel 1 - 0 Campos
They have played 2 sets in total, with Ilkel winning 2 and Campos winning 0. The last match between Ilkel and Campos was at the M25 Roda de Bara, 13-07-2023, Second, Hard with Cem Ilkel getting the victory 6-1 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Cem Ilkel | 1 |
| Alberto Barroso Campos | 0 |
M25 Roda de Bara(13-07-2023)
6
1
6
1
| Ilkel | Stats | Campos |
|---|---|---|
| 78% (29-8) | YTD Win/Loss | 60% (18-12) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 574 | Ranking | 529 |
| 144 | Highest Rank | 316 |
| 29 | Age | 28 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 7 | Titles | 6 |
| 57% (437-334) | Career Total W/L | 62% (297-180) |
| $225,530 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 2 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Khachanov VS Paul PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
28 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Keys VS Vekic PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
28 Apr 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-1 |
Stats 
Cem Ilkel
Player
Alberto Barroso Campos
51%
(
20 of
39)
1st Serve %
41%
(
17 of
41)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
55
Total Points Won
25
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 2 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:5:0 | Average Match Time | 1:5:0 |
| 51% (20/39) | 1st Serve % | 41% (17/41) |
| 85% (17/20) | 1st Serve Win % | 53% (9/17) |
| 63% (12/19) | 2nd Serve Win % | 25% (6/24) |
| 83% (5/6) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 63% (26/41) | Return Points Win % | 26% (10/39) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Cem Ilkel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Saba Purtseladze
Player
Cem Ilkel
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve %
57%
(
40 of
70)
9
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
87%
(
40 of
46)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
17 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
25 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Evgenii Tiurnev
67%
(
56 of
83)
1st Serve %
55%
(
35 of
64)
2
Aces
12
0
Double Faults
3
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
26 of
35)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
30 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
23 of
64)
76
Total Points Won
71
|
2-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Michal Krajci
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
11
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
6
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
22 of
29)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
18 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Kanan Gasimov
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
75)
8
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Saba Purtseladze
Player
Cem Ilkel
61%
(
47 of
77)
1st Serve %
76%
(
62 of
82)
11
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
39 of
62)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
24 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
31 of
82)
84
Total Points Won
75
|
6-1 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Matteo Lavizzari
58%
(
57 of
98)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
99)
6
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
6
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
47 of
59)
56%
(
23 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
34 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
35 of
99)
99
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 2-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
David Poljak
61%
(
62 of
101)
1st Serve %
62%
(
68 of
110)
9
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
46 of
62)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
47 of
68)
64%
(
25 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
30%
(
30 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
41 of
110)
112
Total Points Won
99
|
6-7(3) 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mert Alkaya
Player
Cem Ilkel
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Henri Haupt
31%
(
4 of
13)
1st Serve %
73%
(
11 of
15)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
100%
(
4 of
4)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
89%
(
8 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
8%
(
1 of
13)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
10 of
15)
22
Total Points Won
6
|
5-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Stefanos Sakellaridis
Player
Cem Ilkel
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
56%
(
46 of
82)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
82)
76
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Alberto Barroso Campos Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-1 7-6(6) | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-0 1-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-7(6) 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-0 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 4-6 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alberto Barroso Campos
Player
Rudolf Molleker
63%
(
73 of
116)
1st Serve %
60%
(
58 of
96)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
73%
(
53 of
73)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
40 of
58)
37%
(
16 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
41%
(
47 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
96)
106
Total Points Won
106
|
6-3 3-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gerard Campana Lee
Player
Alberto Barroso Campos
68%
(
50 of
73)
1st Serve %
65%
(
34 of
52)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
71
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (437/334) | Win/Loss | 62% (297/180) |
| 55% (976/807) | Sets Win/Loss | 61% (662/431) |
| 52% (8747/8216) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (5501/4515) |
| 62% (287/178) | Hard Win/Loss | 67% (205/102) |
| 45% (57/71) | Clay Win/Loss | 55% (90/74) |
| 55% (92/76) | Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (2/4) |
| 10% (1/9) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.34 | Aces Per Game | 0.19 |
| 2840 | Aces Total | 905 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.14 |
| 1378 | Total Double Faults | 660 |
| 1:14:59 | Average Match Time | 1:15:9 |
| 531.68 | Average Opponent Rank | 220.29 |
| 58% (23978/41029) | 1st Serve % | 63% (14173/22463) |
| 70% (16866/23978) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (9353/14173) |
| 51% (8703/17051) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (4113/8290) |
| 40% (1616/3998) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (1149/2583) |
| 39% (16139/41486) | Return Points Win % | 43% (9860/23067) |
| 32% (7/15) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 67% (2/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 32% (7/15) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 18% (5/23) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 52% (175/159) | Challenger W/L | 33% (17/35) |
| 67% (241/121) | Futures W/L | 66% (280/144) |
| 57% (425/752) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (294/474) |
| 40% (4/10) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (3/3) |
| 54% (146/272) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 57% (63/110) |
| 56% (130/232) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (68/136) |
| 85% (423/361) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (287/256) |
| 14% (423/60) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (287/31) |
| 21% (347/74) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (190/41) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
